AI first consulting · operations, O2C, P2P, customer service, FP&A

Try the engine before you trust the pitch.

Everyone in this market shows you a diagram. Below is the actual three way match logic we deploy, running in your browser. Move the numbers. Break the tolerance. Watch it refuse, name the reason code and write the supplier's email. Nothing on this page is a screenshot.

Before you ask5 answers
01

You own the asset. Code, schema, documentation and deployment scripts, handed over as they are written.

02

It runs in your tenancy. Your cloud, your accounts, your security policy.

03

No proprietary runtime. Standard technologies a successor team can take over.

04

Zero data retention. No training or fine tuning on your data, ever.

05

Stage gated. Discovery, then a sandbox proof, then build. Stop at any gate.

Three way match · running in this page Move a slider. Break the tolerance. Watch it refuse.

Fixed for this demonstration: purchase order PO-77310 for 1,180 units at 4.00, goods receipt GR-51288 for 1,180 units. You control what the supplier invoiced, and the tolerance the buyer agreed.

1,180 units
4.00
5.0%
Purchase order PO-773104,720.00source
Goods receipt GR-512881,180 unitssource
Quantity on invoice1,180 unitsmatch
Price against purchase order4,720.00match
Variance against order0.00 · 0.0%within

This is a deterministic rules engine, not a model. That is the point. Extraction is where intelligence belongs and judgement is not, so the decision that stops a payment is arithmetic you can audit, and the drafted email is the only part a language model touches. A person still sends it.

Five more, running in your browser Billing accuracy, collections ranking, ticket triage, variance commentary, process knowledge. No account, nothing to upload.
5
process towers covered end to end: operations, order to cash, procure to pay, customer service and financial planning
28
modules built and running across the portfolio, not slideware
6
working demonstrations running in your browser. No account, no upload, nothing to install
0
direct write paths. Every change to a record passes a human gate or an approval gateway

The operating idea

AI reads, reasons and researches. People write and decide.

The rule we apply to every system we build in a system of record

Intelligence is very good at reading a document, finding a match, drafting a reply and explaining a variance. It should not be the thing that posts to your ledger, releases your payment or changes a master record. We separate those two jobs in the architecture itself, so the control is structural rather than a matter of policy.

  • Zero data retention on every model endpoint used
  • No training or fine tuning on your data
  • Append only audit trail of every machine and human action
  • Sandboxed build and test before anything touches production
Reference architecture5 layers
01

Intake. Documents, requests and events arrive from mail, portal or system.

02

Intelligence. Read only. Extraction, matching, research and drafting.

03

Human control. Verification gate, then an approval gate. Both are people.

04

System of record. Your ERP, unchanged. Written only on a human action.

05

Exceptions. Reason coded queue, drafted communication, closed loop.

What you hold at the end

An asset on your balance sheet, not a dependency on ours

Every engagement ends with you holding everything needed to run, change and extend the system without us. This is the clearest answer we can give to the question of what happens if we are not here later, and it is written into the contract rather than promised in a meeting.

The build

  • Source code in your repository
  • Database schema and migrations
  • Deployment scripts and environments

The knowledge

  • Architecture and control documentation
  • Administrator runbook
  • Standard operating procedures

The evidence

  • Test record, including what failed
  • Audit trail design and retention
  • Open list of what is not built

The rights

  • Intellectual property assigned on payment
  • Confidentiality in both directions
  • No licence, no renewal, no lock in

Tell us where the process hurts.

A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether AI belongs in a process, or whether the honest answer is better process design first. We will say which.